Virveln
Den här artikeln behöver källhänvisningar för att kunna verifieras. (2021-10) Åtgärda genom att lägga till pålitliga källor (gärna som fotnoter). Uppgifter utan källhänvisning kan ifrågasättas och tas bort utan att det behöver diskuteras på diskussionssidan. |
Virveln (Torrent) | |
Genre | Drama Romantik |
---|---|
Regissör | Monta Bell |
Producent | Monta Bell Irving Thalberg |
Manus | Vicente Blasco Ibáñez Dorothy Farnum |
Skådespelare | Ricardo Cortez Greta Garbo |
Originalmusik | Arthur Barrow |
Premiär | 1926 |
Speltid | 87 minuter |
Land | USA |
Språk | Engelska |
IMDb |
Virveln (originaltitel: Torrent) är en amerikansk romantisk drama-stumfilm från 1926 i regi av Monta Bell.
Rollista i urval
- Ricardo Cortez – Don Rafael Brull
- Greta Garbo – Leonora Moreno, aka La Brunna
- Gertrude Olmstead – Remedios Matías
- Edward Connelly – Pedro Moreno
- Lucien Littlefield – Cupido, the Barber
- Martha Mattox – Doña Bernarda Brull
- Lucy Beaumont – Doña Pepa Moreno
- Tully Marshall – Don Andrés, a Lawyer
- Mack Swain – Don Matías
Externa länkar
- Virveln på Internet Movie Database (engelska)
Media som används på denna webbplats
Författare/Upphovsman: Tkgd2007, Licens: CC BY-SA 3.0
A new incarnation of Image:Question_book-3.svg, which was uploaded by user AzaToth. This file is available on the English version of Wikipedia under the filename en:Image:Question book-new.svg
Film poster for the American romantic drama film Torrent (1926).
Studio publicity still from the American romantic drama film Torrent (1926), with Greta Garbo and Ricardo Cortez.
- Copyright details
- Additional source information:
- This is a publicity photo taken to promote a film actor. As stated by film production expert Eve Light Honthaner in The Complete Film Production Handbook, (Focal Press, 2001 p. 211.):
- "Publicity photos (star headshots) have traditionally not been copyrighted. Since they are disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain, and therefore clearance by the studio that produced them is not necessary."
- Nancy Wolff, includes a similar explanation:
- "There is a vast body of photographs, including but not limited to publicity stills, that have no notice as to who may have created them." (The Professional Photographer's Legal Handbook By Nancy E. Wolff, Allworth Communications, 2007, p. 55.)
- Film industry author Gerald Mast, in Film Study and the Copyright Law (1989) p. 87, writes:
- "According to the old copyright act, such production stills were not automatically copyrighted as part of the film and required separate copyrights as photographic stills. The new copyright act similarly excludes the production still from automatic copyright but gives the film's copyright owner a five-year period in which to copyright the stills. Most studios have never bothered to copyright these stills because they were happy to see them pass into the public domain, to be used by as many people in as many publications as possible."
- Kristin Thompson, committee chairperson of the Society for Cinema and Media Studies writes in the conclusion of a 1993 conference with cinema scholars and editors, that they "expressed the opinion that it is not necessary for authors to request permission to reproduce frame enlargements. . . [and] some trade presses that publish educational and scholarly film books also take the position that permission is not necessary for reproducing frame enlargements and publicity photographs." [1]