J. D. Salinger (Catcher in the Rye portrait)
- "A notice of copyright on the dust jacket of a book is not an acceptable notice for the book, because the dust jacket is not permanently attached to the book. Likewise, a notice appearing in a book is not an acceptable notice for the dust jacket or any material appearing on that dust jacket, even if the book refers to the jacket or material appearing on the jacket."
Keep in mind that the pre-1989 requirements for copyright notice were highly formalistic and, other than a few enumerated exceptions, required these three elements:
- "The symbol © or the word 'Copyright' or the abbreviation 'Copr.' or an acceptable variant such as "(c)";
- "The year of first publication for the work"; and
- "The name of the copyright owner, or an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner."
If just one of these elements is omitted, the work is deemed to be published without notice and is not eligible for copyright protection. Neither the year "1951" nor a copyright symbol (or any acceptable variant) appear anywhere on the dust jacket. Credits like "Photo by Lotte Jacobi" do not meet these requirements, nor do the identifications of the publisher and author.
Additionally, the image is a mechanical scan/photocopy of the public-domain original photo and does not qualify for independent copyright protection.
A cropped portion of Jacobi's photo was published as the back cover of the first-edition The Catcher in the Rye. The full photo portrait was published sometime later, showing more of Salinger's body and a more extensive background. It is unclear whether the act of publishing the cropped portion without a notice also rendered the "uncropped" portions of the photo in the public domain; a similar issue exists with Guerrillero Heroico, the famous portrait of Che Guevara. Out of an abundance of caution, this file reproduces only the cropped portion that had been published on the back cover, not the full portrait. The original portrait is considered "published" to at least the same extent that it was "disclosed" by the publication of the dust jacket (in this case, the cropped portion was disclosed). See Shoptalk, Ltd. v. Concorde-New Horizons Corp., 168 F.3d 586, 591 (2d Cir. 1999): "[W]hen the author consents to the inclusion of [her] work in a derivative work, the publication of the derivative work, to the extent . . . it discloses the original work, also constitutes publication of [the] underlying work."
Mer information om licensen för bilden finns här. Senaste uppdateringen: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:08:01 GMT